He says that the the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was forced down the throats by the Indian Government and it has created Eight White Elephants called Provincial Councils.
Hence SL admits that the 13th Amendment created eight and not nine Provincial councils.
This means that there must be only eight Provincial councils only. Then How we are having nine Provincial councils?
Is it not in violation of the constitutional provisions.?
According to the 13th amendment the de merger is possible only through a referendum. The constitution is the supreme law of any country and the 13th Amendment has not been further amended.
In this scenario if the Supreme Court points out any lapses, it is the duty of the government to rectify those lapse, not to go against the constitution.
Further
SL says that the 13th amendment was forced down the throats of the people.But how was the entire Constitution of 1978 was formulated?. Was it not forced down the throats of the entire unsuspecting public? What do you say to this SL?

He says that the the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was forced down the throats by the Indian Government and it has created Eight ?White Elephants? called ?Provincial Councils?.

Hence SL admits that the 13th Amendment created eight and not nine Provincial councils.
This means that there must be only eight Provincial councils only. Then How we are having nine Provincial councils?
Is it not in violation of the constitutional provisions.?

According to the 13th amendment the de merger is possible only through a referendum. The constitution is the supreme law of any country and the 13th Amendment has not been further amended.
In this scenario if the Supreme Court points out any lapses, it is the duty of the government to rectify those lapse, not to go against the constitution.

Further SL says that the 13th amendment was forced down the throats of the people.But how was the entire Constitution of 1978 was formulated?. Was it not forced down the throats of the entire unsuspecting public? What do you say to this SL?

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution [forced down our throats by the Indian Government] was an unmitigated disaster which resulted in the creation of Eight ?White Elephants? called ?Provincial Councils?

The term “rebel state” was first used in 1966, when Ian Smith unilaterally declared Rhodesia as a republic with a unilateral constitution. Sri lanka became a rebel state in 1972, when the south unilateraly declared it a republic with a unilateral constitution and illegally annexed the North East of the island.

The rebel state of Rhodesia was rebellious against international norms, laws and standards from its inception. Rhodesian jets bombed and killed civilians in neighbouring Zambia and other countries. The rebellion was finally undone by external intervention. Internal solution was impossible.

The rebel state of Sri Lanka has also been following step by step, the same footsteps of Rhodesia for the past 36 years. The people and the governments are rebellious against the requests of the International Community. It is continuing to violate all norms, standards and laws with impunity. Bombing and killing of Tamil civilians has become a daily occurence. The rebel state, in existence for 36 years, has produced a culture of impunity in the South.

About two weeks ago, the chairperson of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Louise Arbor warned that those in command in Sri Lanka committing criminal acts would be taken to war crimes court.

Here we are, within two weeks, we have witnessed unprecedented killing of school children in Mannar by the miltary and found mass graves in Keppitigollawa. Those in mass graves are believed to be Tamils arrested in Mannar by the military. Rebellion is acute.

A rebel state always will have rebellious leaders and people. The solution for such state rebellion cannot come from within as the International Community expects. Appropriate external intervention is inevitable.

Sri Lanka is not a failed state but a rebel state. Therefore, the UNHRC should firmly ask the rebel state of Sri Lanka to permit the UN monitoring mission. If Sri Lankan state is rebellious against such a request, the UN should recognise the sovereignty of Tamil Eelam.