13th Amendment cannot provide genuine devolution
February 12th, 2008
[The London based Tamil information Centre examines some important features of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka as detailed below]
Provincial Councils
Following the Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement of July 29, 1987, the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lanka Constitution was introduced in October 1987 providing for an elected provincial council, a provincial board of ministers with a chief minister and a provincial governor. A Provincial Councils Act was also introduced. At provincial elections held on November 19, 1988, a North-East Provincial Council (NEPC) controlled by the Eelam People’s Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF) was elected. The NEPC was dissolved in 1990 and since then there have been no provincial council elections in the north-east.
The governor, though not elected, holds all the power, and the ministers, though elected, virtually have no power. There is in reality no devolution of power to the provinces.
The Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement acknowledged that the Northern and the Eastern Provinces “have been areas of historical habitation of the Tamil speaking peoples.” The two provinces were merged as envisaged in the agreement. The Provincial Councils Act provides for a referendum in the Eastern Province to determine whether the eastern people want a permanent merger of the two provinces. The referendum has not been held.
Provincial Governor
Under the 13th Amendment, the President appoints the provincial governor and can dismiss him/her. The governor holds executive power in the province in relation to those matters, which are within the competence of the provincial council. Since the constitution vests executive power in the president, it follows that the governor is subject to control by the president. The governor can exercise his executive power either directly or through the board of ministers or through the members of the provincial public service. The disciplinary control of officers of the province is vested in the governor. The governor will also determine terms and conditions of their employment. He/she can delegate his/her powers to a Public Services Commission (PSC), but PSC will also be appointed by him/her and controlled by him/her. In this circumstance, the board of ministers in effect becomes redundant.
The functions of the chief minister and the board of ministers are to aid and advise the governor in the exercise of his functions. The chief minister must communicate all decisions of the board of ministers to the governor. The ministers also must respond when the governor calls for information. The governor will exercise executive power also in respect of all provincial legislation passed by the provincial council. The governor is empowered to make rules for allocation of business among ministers. The governor can summon the provincial council, including ministers, and give instructions.
If the council fails to comply with any instruction, the president can declare that the powers of the council will be exercised by parliament and that the powers of the ministers will be exercised by the president. The governor has the discretion to ignore the advice of the chief minister and board of ministers. Whether any matter requires the advice of the chief minister will be decided by the governor on the direction of the president and this cannot be called into question in any court.
Finance
Under the 13th Amendment, a Finance Commission consisting of the Governor of the Central Bank, Secretary to the Treasury and three other members each representing the three major communities, (appointed by the president), will recommend the amount to be allocated from the annual budget to meet the needs of the province. The president will decide the amount.
The provincial council cannot pass any laws imposing, altering, abolishing any taxes in the province without the recommendation of the governor. No money can be withdrawn or utilised from the provincial fund (which will include money allocated by the central government and taxes and levies) without the sanction of the governor.
The provincial council does not have powers to borrow internally and externally, provide guarantees and indemnities, receive aid directly, and engage in or regulate internal and external trade. The power to receive aid directly was granted to an elected provincial body under the proposals of the People’s Alliance (PA) in 1995. But this provision was removed in the 1997 draft constitution of the PA.
Take over of functions
Under the Sri Lanka Constitution all powers of auditing of accounts in relation to monies received from international sources are vested in the auditor-general appointed by the president.
If the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the provincial administration cannot be carried out (for example, if the provincial council does not act in accordance with the recommendation of the governor in the case of taxes), the President can take over the functions of the governor, the chief minister and the ministers and also declare that the powers of the provincial council are vested in the central parliament. This cannot be called into question in any court.
Advice
Under the 13th Amendment, the chief minister and the board of ministers can advise the governor only in respect of matters on which the provincial council can pass laws. Over other matters, they cannot even advise. These are as follows:
A. Police
The Inspector General of Police (IGP), who is under the direct control of the president, will be the head of all provincial police forces. A Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) will head the provincial division of the police force. The DIG will be appointed by the IGP with the concurrence of the chief minister, but if there is no agreement, the President will appoint the DIG after consulting the chief minister. The DIG will be responsible to the chief minister and under his control. But there are no provisions for the exercise of such control other than through the IGP and the president.
Recruitment to the provincial police will be through a Provincial Police Commission, composed of three members. The members are the DIG, a person nominated by the Central Public Service Commission in consultation with the president and a nominee of the chief minister. The central government, therefore, will have a majority in the Provincial Police Commission.
Offences against a public officer and offences prejudicial to national security or maintenance of essential services will not be within the competence of the provincial police force. These offences are under the jurisdiction of the national police division. This means that the national police division deals with offences under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).
B. Land and land settlement
Although this matter is in the Provincial List under the 13th Amendment, the disposal of land within the province will be under the direct control of the president. State lands will not be vested in the provincial council and therefore it will not be able to distribute land to the people in the province.
There is a long-standing complaint of the people in the north-east relating to distribution of state lands to those from outside the north-east and forcible occupation of private lands as a result of government-organised colonisation or settlement programmes.
Judiciary
Under the Sri Lanka Constitution, judicial power is exercised by parliament through courts established by law. The President appoints the judges of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal on recommendations made by the Constitutional Council. President Rajapakse has been acting unconstitutionally by making appointments without the recommendations of a Constitutional Council. Under the 13th Amendment, a High Court is established for the province. The Chief Justice chooses the High Court judge for a province from among the High Court judges and is appointed by the President.
The High Court in each province has original criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences within the province and appellate jurisdiction in respect of decisions of Magistrates Courts and Primary Courts within the province. From the decisions of these courts, appeals lie to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Courts of Sri Lanka on matters prescribed.
The three lists
The 13th Amendment provides three lists:
Provincial Council List-The provincial council may make laws applicable to the province in respect of matters in this list.
Concurrent List-Both the Sri Lanka Parliament and the provincial council may legislate on matters in this list.
Reserved List-Only parliament may make laws in respect of matters in this list. Despite this, the central parliament will be able to legislate by a simple majority on all subjects on grounds of national policy.
The law-making powers of the provincial council do not include national policy. Parliament can also legislate in respect of any subject in the Provincial Council List if such law is necessary for implementing any treaty, agreement or decision at an international conference. This would enable parliament to legislate in respect of any matters in all three lists.
Tamil Information Centre
London
Entry Filed under: Federalidea
5 Comments Add your own
1. Sri | February 13th, 2008 at 6:51 am
It is a good summary of the 13th Amendment with some ambiquity.
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka indicates limits in the exercise of power
by the governor.
Article 154 B (8)d of the 13 th Amendment.”The Governor shall exercise his power under this paragraph in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister, so long as the Board of Ministers commands, in the option of the Governor, the support of the majority of the Provincial Council”. .
Article154F (1 )”There shall be a Board of Ministers with the Chief Minister at the head and not more than four other Ministers to aid and advice the Governor of a province on the exercise of his functions. The Governor shall, in the exercise of his functions act in accordance of such advice except in so far as he is by or under the Constitution required to exercise his function or any of them in his discretion.”
You say that the Governor has a discretion to ignore the advice of the Chief Minster and board of Ministers. This is not factually correct and it is not always true. The occasions where the Governor could exercise his discretion is also stipulated in the 13th Amendment.
This response is not to defend the 13th Amendment, but to correct a factual error
2. Gamini | February 13th, 2008 at 8:00 am
Dont waste time writing five page statements simply and honestly state….
“No political solution will ever be acceptable to the LTTE terrorists and us the Tamil Information Centre as their public relations arm”
3. Shantha Gamlath | February 13th, 2008 at 11:24 am
In this examination that can be identified some positive as well as negative point s. But , when we define the 13 th amendment that is a great opportunity in sri lankan Tamil ethnicity becouse that was a first attempt which is introducing of semi federal systemic model for ethnic issue in sri lanka. So, should be look for that kind of positive aspect (if it is possible fully implementation with given constitutional privileges). Some time it ,s very much close to Indian model. as we know existing provincial councils that they have been implementing their subjects in their given privileges by the amendment. Al so should be understand that current system have various practical issues. But, if there any possibility to implement 13th amendment with comprehensively that there will be a positive approach of the devolution of political power from center to regions. In simultaneously, Dispute resolution mechanism should be strength in to constitution. On the other hand as a initial step, 13 th amendment has gained majority consensuses. Even extremist nationalist maxims parties has take part with this system. Therefore any body cant reject current system, and they can strength and strong existing system within constitutional provisions. Beside,This is a good opportunity to response for extremist political parties on devolution of political power in country.Some time singhala majority consensuses will concentrate in this attempt. How can we avoid such a occasion with showing various bargains and logical interpretations. First of all , we should think cost benefit of war in day by day.Technical difficulties of the existing system can be negotiate with the relevant parties. therefor in very simply, should not lost positive steps and consensuses for future compromise politics in sri lanka.Further, should be read 13th amendment very carefully becouse it has very important features for a diverse society . It was born through agreement signed between India and sri lanka. Other hand as a international agreement, parties will responsible fully implementation in practice in real context. 13th amendment ,that it has identified by the international legal experts as a turning point of sri lankan devolution process .
4. ilaya seran senguttuvan | February 25th, 2008 at 7:45 am
The current high profile efforts to devolve power to the Provinces is a farce. No Sinhala political leadership will be allowed to do this by the all powerful buddhist clergy - whose accumulation of power is inconsistent with their knowledge of the political history of this country except their own distorted version. JRJ had the chance to devolve power to the North-East in 1987 only but Premadasa, Athulathmudali, Mathew et al under the influence of the late Maddihe Panaseeha Thero, Until such time Sri Lanka will be immersed in her on going blood bath which, I hope not but fear, will increase in the coming days.
5. TIC | February 29th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Response of the Tamil Information Centre
28 February 2008
We thank Sri for the comment (13 February 2008) on our note on the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lankan Constitution. The TIC welcomes comments and opinions on its publications and statements.
Sri’s comment is not accurate and we believe has arisen by a narrow reading and interpretation of the provisions of the Sri Lanka Constitution. Sri’s reference to Article 154B (8) (d) deals only with the issue of summoning, proroguing and dissolving a Provincial Council. It is in that context that the Governor is expected to act in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister. But this also depends on the opinion of the Governor. According to the constitutional Article, the Governor is expected to listen to the advice of the Chief Minister, where, in the Governor’s opinion, the Board of Ministers commands the support of the majority in the Provincial Council.
With regard to Article 154F (1) cited, Sri has not referred to Article 154F (2) which gives the Governor discretion to decide whether a matter is or is not a matter regarding which he has to act in his discretion. His decision, taken in his discretion, is final. The validity of anything done by the Governor cannot be called in question in any court on the ground that he ought or ought not have acted on his discretion. Article 154F (2) also provides that the exercise of the Governor’s discretion shall be on the President’s directions. This Article virtually negates all possible ‘aiding and advising’ functions of the Board of Ministers referred to in Article 154F (1) except those which are specifically provided for in the 13th Amendment. In the 13th Amendment, there is only one instance where his exercise of power is constrained or structured. This is found in the proviso to Article 154F (4) ‘regarding the appointment of the Chief Minister. With regard to the appointment of Ministers, he is expected to obtain the advice of the Chief Minister, but there is no mandatory requirement that he has to act in accordance with such advice. There have been instances where the Governors of Provinces have ignored the advice given by the Chief Ministers and the latter had no recourse.
Sri’s statement, viz. ‘The occasions where the Governor could exercise his discretion is also stipulated in the 13th Amendment’, is inaccurate. As indicated above, under the 13th Amendment there is only one instance where the Governor is really required to act on the advice of the Chief Minister. Contrary to Sri’s statement, the 13th Amendment has not only left the scope of discretion of the Governor wide and open, giving to the Governor the power to decide, in his discretion, whether he should or should not act in his discretion on a matter, but has also excluded judicial review of such decision. Perhaps this is in line with Article 2, 4(b) and 154B (2) of the Constitution which maintain the unitary character of the State.
If elected representatives of the people in a Province can be overruled by an appointed official of the President, though the President is elected by the People, it is not devolution of power, but an affront to democracy. It is evidently demonstrable that a particular candidate who becomes the President of the country could have been defeated by the people of certain Provinces; but he/she could, through his/her agent in the form of Governor, defeat the will of the people in the Province. This is the problem with the whole of the structure and implementation of the 13th Amendment.
The TIC wishes to make a further comment regarding the appointment of officers to the Provincial Public Service. If the position at national level is considered, although the President enjoys enormous executive power, the powers relating to the appointment, transfer, promotion, dismissal and disciplinary control of the public officers was vested in the Cabinet of Ministers before the 17th Amendment and not in the President. This position changed after the 17th Amendment and the powers relating to the appointment, transfer, promotion, dismissal and disciplinary control of the public officers was vested in the Public Service Commission [Article 55 (1)]. However, with regard to the Provincial Public Officers, such powers are vested in the Governor and the position did not change even after the 17th Amendment [Section 32 (1) ‘Provincial Councils Act]. In other words, the Governor of a Province enjoys significant power, which has a telling effect on the efficiency and impartiality of the Provincial Public Service.
It is remarkable that the agent of the President has powers superior to the President in relation the Provincial Public Service. The issue of the Governor acting on the advice of the Board of Ministers with regard to the appointment and disciplinary control of the Provincial Public Service came before the Court of Appeal. The Court, being perhaps centrally minded, held that the Governor need not appoint any person on the advice of the Chief Minister or the Board of Ministers, but can act in his/her own judgment. Even the Judiciary has upheld the position that the Board of Ministers does not play a role in the Provincial Public Service.
Articles 154B (8), Article 154F (2) and Article 154F (4) are given below for easy reference.
Article 154B (8)
(a)The Governor may, from time to time, summon the Provincial Council to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit, but two months shall not intervene between the last sitting in one session and the date appointed for the first sitting in the next session.
(b) The Governor may, from time to time, prorogue the Provincial Council.
(c) The Governor may dissolve the Provincial Council.
(d) The Governor shall exercise his powers under this paragraph in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister, so long as the Board of Ministers commands, in the opinion of the Governor, the support of the majority of the Provincial Council.
Article 154F (2)
If any question arises whether any matter is or is not a matter as respects which the Governor is by or under this Constitution required to act in his discretion, the decision of the Governor in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done by the Governor shall not be called in question in any Court on the ground that he ought or ought not have acted on his discretion. The exercise of the Governor’s discretion shall be on the President’s directions.
Article 154F (4)
The Governor shall appoint as Chief Minister, the member of the Provincial Council constituted for that Province, who, in his opinion, is best able to command the support of a majority of the member of the Council:
Provided that where more than one-half of the members elected to a Provincial Council are members of one political party, the Governor shall appoint the leader of that political party in the Council, as Chief Minister.
Leave a Comment
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed