<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Nation building project continues to be a failure&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://federalidea.com/focus/index.php/archives/310/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suresh M</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5091</link>
		<dc:creator>Suresh M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5091</guid>
		<description>Dr.Rohan Edrisinha,

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr.Rohan Edrisinha,</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilaya seran senguttuvan</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5088</link>
		<dc:creator>ilaya seran senguttuvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5088</guid>
		<description>My continuation of the previous comments got cut off....It is because Indian leaders had the wisdom and foresight 60 years to build a single  Indian identity from their labyrinthine diversity,
today they are a political and economic power.  While they could not feed or find employment to the 500 million of their total population then , today while their  populatin is 1.2 billion they have given
Indians a higher standard of life, a better quality life and by 2025
India and China will be within the first five biggest economies. Of course, India has far to go. They still have to succeed in
providing Indians with clean drinking water, better and healthier cities than the mega slums that is Bombay, Calcutta and Delhi.
More than anything else change the distortion while they export millions of tons of rice, wheat and sugar still several millions of their poor go without food daily; lack basic hygiene and the
living standards between the rich/the middle classes and the lower middle classes and the marginalised remain a stark
symbol of shame. But the good side of it is, the Indian Govt and indian society recognise their weaknesses and are doing something to change this - while we are hiding all our faults and the crimes against our own people.
Do we have the good sense to learn from our neighbour even at this late stage or are we going back to square one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My continuation of the previous comments got cut off&#8230;.It is because Indian leaders had the wisdom and foresight 60 years to build a single  Indian identity from their labyrinthine diversity,<br />
today they are a political and economic power.  While they could not feed or find employment to the 500 million of their total population then , today while their  populatin is 1.2 billion they have given<br />
Indians a higher standard of life, a better quality life and by 2025<br />
India and China will be within the first five biggest economies. Of course, India has far to go. They still have to succeed in<br />
providing Indians with clean drinking water, better and healthier cities than the mega slums that is Bombay, Calcutta and Delhi.<br />
More than anything else change the distortion while they export millions of tons of rice, wheat and sugar still several millions of their poor go without food daily; lack basic hygiene and the<br />
living standards between the rich/the middle classes and the lower middle classes and the marginalised remain a stark<br />
symbol of shame. But the good side of it is, the Indian Govt and indian society recognise their weaknesses and are doing something to change this &#8211; while we are hiding all our faults and the crimes against our own people.<br />
Do we have the good sense to learn from our neighbour even at this late stage or are we going back to square one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilaya seran senguttuvan</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>ilaya seran senguttuvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>India, Pakistan and Ceylon got  their respective freedoms from British colonial rule - just about the same time around 60 years ago. The majority Ceylonese leaders of the Sinhala community, teething with anti-Indianism and the de-franchising of a million Tamils in the Plantation areas - were hell bent to build a Buddhist Sinhala Society. ignoring even the patriotic Christian Sinhalese. The agenda gathered momentum after 1956. Pakistan went out to build a theorcratic Islamic society although ironically her founder Mohd Ali Jinnah sincerely assured his followers a secular society where all religions will be constitutionally respected.  This pledge remains in ruins.  The great Indian leaders like Gandhiji, Nehru, Rajaji and thousands of others went out to unite the diverse sub-continent then with hundreds of  languages, religions and cultures by working on an Agenda of a single Indian secular identity from the Himalayas in the North to Cape Comorin in the deep South and from the coasts of Gujarat in the West to the mountains of the Begali plateau.  Today, due to these policies Pakistan lies divided and in ruins. It is possible there will be further bifurcation of the present Pakistan in the coming years based on regionalism and tribalism.

Sri Lanka - the best bet in the whole of South Asia then - both for economic prosperity and political development remains fractured, her economy in ruins and her political system in total dis-array. Not that the political leadership from 1948 was not aware where the problem lies in the Island. They failed to educate the confused semi-literate majority of the wisdom of power-sharing with the main minority.  They failed to impress on the vast mass of the Sinhala majority that the Island had 3 kingdoms when the 1st colonialists - the Portugese came in the 16th century and that the Tamils were not provided sufficient power sharing when the British handed over reins in 1948. The minor suggestions of the Tamils even on  the National Flag was ignored. Tamils were not part of the National Assembly that drafted the flawed Republican Constitution of 1972.  Tamil MPs of the North East were arrogantly evicted from Parliament inspired by a power-drunk anti-Tamil President under the 6th amendment - and the 1978 disputed Constitution was thrust down the throat of the people. The tradition follows to the day when the so-called APRC has kept the Parliamentarians of the North East the TNA  out. The largest Opposition Party the UNP and the 3rd largest the JVP are not part of the APRC. Who are you fooling calling it the All Party Conference? The smiling President promised the world via his comical show in the NDTV Walk the Talk show of Shekar Gupta that he will give 13th Amendment + to the Tamils as a way out of the impasse.

The central feature of the 13th Amendment was the merger of the North-East, whose death the Supreme Court ensured on a minor legal issue. Removing Police, Land and other key powers from the PC&#039;s actually means the 13th Amendment as it stands today is very much minus rather than plus. By the time our Sinhala leaders and the Clergy come to their senses there will be nothing left in the country for anybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India, Pakistan and Ceylon got  their respective freedoms from British colonial rule &#8211; just about the same time around 60 years ago. The majority Ceylonese leaders of the Sinhala community, teething with anti-Indianism and the de-franchising of a million Tamils in the Plantation areas &#8211; were hell bent to build a Buddhist Sinhala Society. ignoring even the patriotic Christian Sinhalese. The agenda gathered momentum after 1956. Pakistan went out to build a theorcratic Islamic society although ironically her founder Mohd Ali Jinnah sincerely assured his followers a secular society where all religions will be constitutionally respected.  This pledge remains in ruins.  The great Indian leaders like Gandhiji, Nehru, Rajaji and thousands of others went out to unite the diverse sub-continent then with hundreds of  languages, religions and cultures by working on an Agenda of a single Indian secular identity from the Himalayas in the North to Cape Comorin in the deep South and from the coasts of Gujarat in the West to the mountains of the Begali plateau.  Today, due to these policies Pakistan lies divided and in ruins. It is possible there will be further bifurcation of the present Pakistan in the coming years based on regionalism and tribalism.</p>
<p>Sri Lanka &#8211; the best bet in the whole of South Asia then &#8211; both for economic prosperity and political development remains fractured, her economy in ruins and her political system in total dis-array. Not that the political leadership from 1948 was not aware where the problem lies in the Island. They failed to educate the confused semi-literate majority of the wisdom of power-sharing with the main minority.  They failed to impress on the vast mass of the Sinhala majority that the Island had 3 kingdoms when the 1st colonialists &#8211; the Portugese came in the 16th century and that the Tamils were not provided sufficient power sharing when the British handed over reins in 1948. The minor suggestions of the Tamils even on  the National Flag was ignored. Tamils were not part of the National Assembly that drafted the flawed Republican Constitution of 1972.  Tamil MPs of the North East were arrogantly evicted from Parliament inspired by a power-drunk anti-Tamil President under the 6th amendment &#8211; and the 1978 disputed Constitution was thrust down the throat of the people. The tradition follows to the day when the so-called APRC has kept the Parliamentarians of the North East the TNA  out. The largest Opposition Party the UNP and the 3rd largest the JVP are not part of the APRC. Who are you fooling calling it the All Party Conference? The smiling President promised the world via his comical show in the NDTV Walk the Talk show of Shekar Gupta that he will give 13th Amendment + to the Tamils as a way out of the impasse.</p>
<p>The central feature of the 13th Amendment was the merger of the North-East, whose death the Supreme Court ensured on a minor legal issue. Removing Police, Land and other key powers from the PC&#8217;s actually means the 13th Amendment as it stands today is very much minus rather than plus. By the time our Sinhala leaders and the Clergy come to their senses there will be nothing left in the country for anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sri</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator>Sri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5056</guid>
		<description>A well written discouse from Dr Rohan Edirishinge an constitutional expert.However it seem to be  only an academic exersise.how to make them work,hence this response.

A prerequisite to the resolution of ethnic problem in Sri Lanka within a united country undoubtedly is the reform of the state.

 The rule of law and Good Governance will remain as  mere words in the political discourse. 

Are we happy with the implementation of the constitutional provisions however flawed they may be, with the public service, legislature, police and judiciary?

What has happened to the 13th 16th and 17th Amendments to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

The constitution is supposed to be supreme.  

Were the implemented in full in letter and sprit? Or even partially? Why they were not implemented? How we can make them implement before we go any further?

Three amendments which could have gone a long way in solving most of the problems to a great extent remains only in paper.

The constitution is also seems to be a piece of paper.

In this scenario why worry about APRC or any amendments to the constitution?

.They also could be thrown to the dustbin and the problems will persist alon with terrorism.
.
Is it possible to move gradually step by step or we have to wait for a big bang ie for a revolutionary change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well written discouse from Dr Rohan Edirishinge an constitutional expert.However it seem to be  only an academic exersise.how to make them work,hence this response.</p>
<p>A prerequisite to the resolution of ethnic problem in Sri Lanka within a united country undoubtedly is the reform of the state.</p>
<p> The rule of law and Good Governance will remain as  mere words in the political discourse. </p>
<p>Are we happy with the implementation of the constitutional provisions however flawed they may be, with the public service, legislature, police and judiciary?</p>
<p>What has happened to the 13th 16th and 17th Amendments to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.</p>
<p>The constitution is supposed to be supreme.  </p>
<p>Were the implemented in full in letter and sprit? Or even partially? Why they were not implemented? How we can make them implement before we go any further?</p>
<p>Three amendments which could have gone a long way in solving most of the problems to a great extent remains only in paper.</p>
<p>The constitution is also seems to be a piece of paper.</p>
<p>In this scenario why worry about APRC or any amendments to the constitution?</p>
<p>.They also could be thrown to the dustbin and the problems will persist alon with terrorism.<br />
.<br />
Is it possible to move gradually step by step or we have to wait for a big bang ie for a revolutionary change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.S.Ganeshan</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5013</link>
		<dc:creator>R.S.Ganeshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5013</guid>
		<description>Rohan Edirisinghe&#039;s contribution is saturated with reason,logic and method and so are the other comments 1 to 4 but the problem is to get down to brass tacks and create the conditions for the people of Sri Lanka to live amicably,at peace and with continued progress
and to find the Unity in Diversity as the good poet Rabindranath stated in the Gitanjali.........
&quot;   Where the mind is without fear
   and the head held high
    Where knowledge is free
   where the world has not been 
   broken up into fragments
   by narrow domestic walls,
   Where words come up from the depths of truth
   Where tireless striving stretches it&#039;s arms 
   towards perfection,
   Where the clear stream of reason has
   not lost its way into the dreary sands of dead habit
   Where the mind is led forward by thee into
   ever widening thought and action
   Into that heaven of freedom my father
   Let my country awake&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rohan Edirisinghe&#8217;s contribution is saturated with reason,logic and method and so are the other comments 1 to 4 but the problem is to get down to brass tacks and create the conditions for the people of Sri Lanka to live amicably,at peace and with continued progress<br />
and to find the Unity in Diversity as the good poet Rabindranath stated in the Gitanjali&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&#8221;   Where the mind is without fear<br />
   and the head held high<br />
    Where knowledge is free<br />
   where the world has not been<br />
   broken up into fragments<br />
   by narrow domestic walls,<br />
   Where words come up from the depths of truth<br />
   Where tireless striving stretches it&#8217;s arms<br />
   towards perfection,<br />
   Where the clear stream of reason has<br />
   not lost its way into the dreary sands of dead habit<br />
   Where the mind is led forward by thee into<br />
   ever widening thought and action<br />
   Into that heaven of freedom my father<br />
   Let my country awake&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Thambipillai</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-5009</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Thambipillai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-5009</guid>
		<description>The former island of Ceylon started its deacy from the year 1972, when the South created a rebel state calling it Sri Lanka. Subsequent  governments were monarchic, treating the Tamils of North East as their subjects.

They devised &quot;divide and rule&quot; tool of control over North East, whenever possible.

Sinhalese were enjoying the priveleges of subjugation and they never raised concern about the cruel and inhuman treatment of the Tamils.

Consequently, the Sinhalese were not concentrating their minds on developing a peaceful and stable country. On the otherhand The Tamils were busy planning either to escape the cruel and inhuman treatment or resist with all their abilities.

From both sides, brains were not directed towards development and so the deacy commenced and progressed..

It is the Sinhalese, who originated this cycle. They must realise their folly without delay and recognise the legitimate right of the people of North East to establish Tamil Eelam.

If that is done,  the citizens of both Tamil Eelam and Sri Lanka could be expected to focus their minds on development and bring prosperity to the entire island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former island of Ceylon started its deacy from the year 1972, when the South created a rebel state calling it Sri Lanka. Subsequent  governments were monarchic, treating the Tamils of North East as their subjects.</p>
<p>They devised &#8220;divide and rule&#8221; tool of control over North East, whenever possible.</p>
<p>Sinhalese were enjoying the priveleges of subjugation and they never raised concern about the cruel and inhuman treatment of the Tamils.</p>
<p>Consequently, the Sinhalese were not concentrating their minds on developing a peaceful and stable country. On the otherhand The Tamils were busy planning either to escape the cruel and inhuman treatment or resist with all their abilities.</p>
<p>From both sides, brains were not directed towards development and so the deacy commenced and progressed..</p>
<p>It is the Sinhalese, who originated this cycle. They must realise their folly without delay and recognise the legitimate right of the people of North East to establish Tamil Eelam.</p>
<p>If that is done,  the citizens of both Tamil Eelam and Sri Lanka could be expected to focus their minds on development and bring prosperity to the entire island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subra S.Massey</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>Subra S.Massey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>Mr. Rohan Edrisingha,
I read part of you article I know where you are coming from.

We have to educate our people into self esteem and self respect. We all must think that we are Sri Lankans first.
If we don&#039;t have self esteem we have nothing to lose and if we have no food we have nothing to live for. So there is nothing for people to look for tomorrow. Look at family with children and a family without children. My wife wakes up in morning to serve the children and I go to work to bring food. We have something to hope for. and the other family is just waiting to die for they have no hope. We have to give the people of Sri Lanka HOPE of a better living.
Sri Lankan are the best people in the world but they have been conditioned to hate each other and kill each other.
Moderate people must get together and stop this stupidity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Rohan Edrisingha,<br />
I read part of you article I know where you are coming from.</p>
<p>We have to educate our people into self esteem and self respect. We all must think that we are Sri Lankans first.<br />
If we don&#8217;t have self esteem we have nothing to lose and if we have no food we have nothing to live for. So there is nothing for people to look for tomorrow. Look at family with children and a family without children. My wife wakes up in morning to serve the children and I go to work to bring food. We have something to hope for. and the other family is just waiting to die for they have no hope. We have to give the people of Sri Lanka HOPE of a better living.<br />
Sri Lankan are the best people in the world but they have been conditioned to hate each other and kill each other.<br />
Moderate people must get together and stop this stupidity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Rajasingam</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Rajasingam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>One correction please. The word in last line should be read as &#039;reverted&#039;. 
Stricyly speaking both the 1972 and 1978 constitutions were designed by the rulers for their benefit and not for the public in general. The Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord had the impact of rectifying the 1978 constitution gradually. Since independence Sri Lanka saw three constitutions within a period of thirty years. India and USA had only one constitution drafted by broad-minded legislators. Changing a constitution as when the politicians desire would not help the Nation building. This is also one reason why the Accord was instrumental for the passing of the 13th Amendment which if implemented would have paved the way for Nation building. Perhaps there would have been further Amendments for the rest seven Provinces to be divided into Four Provinces. Had there been Five Provinces there would have been a perfect harmony among the Provinces and the Central government within a United Sri Lanka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction please. The word in last line should be read as &#8216;reverted&#8217;.<br />
Stricyly speaking both the 1972 and 1978 constitutions were designed by the rulers for their benefit and not for the public in general. The Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord had the impact of rectifying the 1978 constitution gradually. Since independence Sri Lanka saw three constitutions within a period of thirty years. India and USA had only one constitution drafted by broad-minded legislators. Changing a constitution as when the politicians desire would not help the Nation building. This is also one reason why the Accord was instrumental for the passing of the 13th Amendment which if implemented would have paved the way for Nation building. Perhaps there would have been further Amendments for the rest seven Provinces to be divided into Four Provinces. Had there been Five Provinces there would have been a perfect harmony among the Provinces and the Central government within a United Sri Lanka.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruwani Perera</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-4992</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruwani Perera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-4992</guid>
		<description>Dr.Rohan Edirisinghe,

I agree with you totally. 
The point is that, the Sinhala leadership never wanted unity and a secular multi-ethnic society. The sinhalese enmasse voted in SWRD and the rot set in then on. We sinhalese also wanted the SL to be &quot;Ours&quot; only and thus voted SLFP time after time. UNP, could have been a bit tolerating to minorities,but, political climate and defeats in elections also made them toe the &quot;Sinhala Only&quot; line.
Nation Building is an art perfected by one and only Mr.Lee Kwan Yee. We never had leaders of his calibre even though the Oxford educated pimps only thought of thier own political survival and never looked beyond their next trem in office.
Barristers, Lawyers, Scientists etc etc have been in power only to fall prey to their own machinations of minority marginalisation.
An utter failure in nation building exercise, the Tamil nation need not have to suffer further due to Sinhala leaderships&#039; inability and short comings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr.Rohan Edirisinghe,</p>
<p>I agree with you totally.<br />
The point is that, the Sinhala leadership never wanted unity and a secular multi-ethnic society. The sinhalese enmasse voted in SWRD and the rot set in then on. We sinhalese also wanted the SL to be &#8220;Ours&#8221; only and thus voted SLFP time after time. UNP, could have been a bit tolerating to minorities,but, political climate and defeats in elections also made them toe the &#8220;Sinhala Only&#8221; line.<br />
Nation Building is an art perfected by one and only Mr.Lee Kwan Yee. We never had leaders of his calibre even though the Oxford educated pimps only thought of thier own political survival and never looked beyond their next trem in office.<br />
Barristers, Lawyers, Scientists etc etc have been in power only to fall prey to their own machinations of minority marginalisation.<br />
An utter failure in nation building exercise, the Tamil nation need not have to suffer further due to Sinhala leaderships&#8217; inability and short comings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.Rajasingam</title>
		<link>http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310/comment-page-1#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>A.Rajasingam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/310#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>The writer has perfectly pin pointed that power sharing and federalism was never considered within a united Sri Lanka. The question of Nation building has been undermined by the architects of both the 1972 and 1978 constitutions with unlimited powers of the Prime Minister and the President respectively., the result of which eventually saw the birth of terrorism in the country. However, the fact remains that there was an opportunity with the signing of the Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord which was spoilt by Anton Balasingam who misguided the LTTE resulting in the loss of thousands of innocent lives. The lack of realization of the pains taken by Rajiv Gandhi, G.Parthasarathy and P.Chidambaram had not only led Sri Lanka to a deteriorating situation on account of the short-sightedness of the politicians, but also frustrated the beginning of a Nation building. The short-sightedness of the political leaders has riverted Sri Lanka back to square one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writer has perfectly pin pointed that power sharing and federalism was never considered within a united Sri Lanka. The question of Nation building has been undermined by the architects of both the 1972 and 1978 constitutions with unlimited powers of the Prime Minister and the President respectively., the result of which eventually saw the birth of terrorism in the country. However, the fact remains that there was an opportunity with the signing of the Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord which was spoilt by Anton Balasingam who misguided the LTTE resulting in the loss of thousands of innocent lives. The lack of realization of the pains taken by Rajiv Gandhi, G.Parthasarathy and P.Chidambaram had not only led Sri Lanka to a deteriorating situation on account of the short-sightedness of the politicians, but also frustrated the beginning of a Nation building. The short-sightedness of the political leaders has riverted Sri Lanka back to square one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 10.814 seconds -->
